Posted by: T. Boyd | April 10, 2010

Another attempt – micrometeorites

This time I have collected rain water and will try wrapping a strong magnet in plastic wrap, where the magnetic face will be nice and smooth.

Then I will swish it around in the pan with the water, hoping it will attract iron particles strong enough so that when I remove the wrapped plastic from the water, those particles will adhere to the surface.

I will next, place the wrapped magnet into a shallow plate of water, carefully unfold the plastic wrap so I can lift the magnet away, and leave the particles, if any, behind in the plate.  Then I will remove the plastic wrap off of the water surface, hoping that the particles will fall off into the water.

[added later:]  Finally, I will place the plate of water under a clip-on light as a heat source to evaporate the water.  Using some “sticky notes” I will collect the particles left on the plate and examine them under a microscope.

I will let you know if this technique works.  I got the idea from one of the references in my original article.

[ Note:  the results were "null" - see my last comment below.]

P.S. We are busy getting our house ready to sell and find a new home in Richmond, VA.  So my writing has dwindled considerably.  I hope it will become regular again after this huge adjustment in life.  :-)

Boyd

Posted by: T. Boyd | March 11, 2010

Finding Rest at a Lagrangian Point

Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. (Matthew 11:28)

If you have studied the problems of keeping a satellite in orbit around the earth, you know that there have to be periodic adjustments made to its speed and direction. Otherwise the orbit will degrade so that a satellite can no longer perform its function. The adjustments are usually made by commanding small jets to eject a precise amount of compressed gas that is stored on the satellite. The ground controllers call these adjustments “burns.”

And this problem is prevalent no matter where you would try to place a space object in the solar system except at some very special points in space called Lagrangian Points. They are labeled L1, L2, … L5. There are 5 L points for each pair of orbiting bodies, like the Sun-Earth system and the Sun-Mars system as well as for the Earth-Moon pair of bodies, as seen in the diagram that is in the Wikipedia: Lagrangian Point article.

Lagrange points for Earth-Moon

The two points, L4 and L5, are the best choices for a stable location because if the satellite drifts away from the point in any direction, the effects of gravity plus momentum will keep it close to the Lagrangian point. The blue arrows show the limits of the “safe region”.

On the other hand, L1, L2, and L3 only have temporary stability and a satellite at those positions has to have periodic adjustments to keep it there. Drifting any amount toward or away from the earth or moon will produce instability. Thus, though it takes less “fuel” to keep a satellite at those points, the “burns” are still required.

I just chatted on-line with my friend Chandra in India – he worked on a version of this problem in college. It was called the 3-body problem discussed by Newton in 1687 and by Euler in 1767, and then by Lagrange in 1772.( ref: Wikipedia article: Three-body_problem)

For only 2 bodies in space, the prediction of their orbits around each other is easily calculated. But add a 3rd body and their orbits become unpredictable except in restricted circumstances. Outside those restrictions, the motion is chaotic – in fact, the academic field of Chaos was established to deal with this kind of motion.

I find it amazing that our Lord Jesus, who was the one through whom the universe was created (Hebrews 1:2), is also the one that made the laws by which it behaves. He knows all about the chaos that it is all heading for, and provides for us a safe, stable resting place in Him.

Take my yoke upon you and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

(Matthew 6:29-30)

Posted by: T. Boyd | March 2, 2010

Ideas for new articles

I need help!  Here are some ideas for upcoming subjects.  Please write/post what you would like to discusss and think about.

The moon and its splendor

Holograms & the gospel

  • Takes special light to illuminate it, otherwise looks like random pattern
  • Every part of the film shows the complete subject in 3-d, but only from a limited angle – all the pieces are needed to see all sides of the subject.

Share about Brahms Requiem and its libretto – so moving to me.

Rods and cones and seeing color under moonlight.

Mössbauer effect in nuclear physics

Millikan oil drop experiment

Atomic structure and energy transitions

Radiological dating

Colors (Mr. Land’s demos – the founder/inventer of Polaroid)

Solids, liquids – states of matter

Superconductivity, superfluids

Lagrangian points (note grav of moon vs grav of sun:  57 x 10^3 sun/moon ratio)

Bear constellations & new star

Circular motion

Details on meteors

Details on comets

Here’s a wild idea: write a story of what heaven will be like – seeing the glory, the wonder, the friendships, the great “library” where everything ever written worthwhile has been kept, where the history of man is fully recorded for playback (time travel?); A music library with every song ever written that glorifies the Lord and His creation;  He equips the saints also with an unlimited workshop for new creations; the beauty of a perfect, non-dying world; a river whose waters make glad the city of God – not just a small, trickle, but a vast source of water – not pouring into a dead end of an ocean, but into living pools of clean, clear water for boating, swimming, for enjoyment; a light that is better than sunlight, yet does no damage or cause discomfort;  and on and on….

Posted by: T. Boyd | February 28, 2010

Where are the MicroMeteorites?

I wrote a year ago or so on this blog about finding micrometeorites in the snow, or in rain, or in just dust falling from the sky. And I talked about that it is estimated that a large fraction of these have iron in them, whereby they can be affected by a magnet.

Since that time, I have probably attempted more than 10 times to find a magnetic micrometeorite in snow, rain, and dust, to no avail. [Actually, I just re-read the previous article and remember I did find one potential particle which I accidentally lost in the search.]

I have looked at 1000′s of potential particles under a microscope with a strong magnet moving under the slide in close proximity, and have yet seen one such micrometeorite. There have been 2-3 flat looking magnetic particles which I imagine came from industrial polution, but they did not at all look like photographs of micrometeorites.

On the other hand, I have found probably 100 non-magnetic particles that look like photographs of the micrometeorites – they are black, rounded, and shiny, and in the average diameter I would say was about 1/10 mm.

So, I am wanting to know if others have had better luck in finding them, and what techniques did they use? I am suspicious that some of the “how to’s” I have read were not performed by the writers of those documents.

If you have a reference or an experience to share with me, please respond below or write e-mail to BrightMysteries@verizon.net

Thank you very much.

Boyd

Posted by: T. Boyd | February 10, 2010

Egg Shapes and Arches

David and his bridge that underwent destructive testing in high school

The owl will nest there and lay eggs, she will hatch them, and care for her young under the shadow of her wings. (Isaiah 34:15)

Periodically our son and grandson come to search the stuff stored in our attic for toys and memories.  This past visit, they found a balsa-wood model bridge that my son had built in high school for a classroom contest.  I had suggested that the catenary shape might be the strongest shape to use for the weight-bearing parts of the bridge.  I left the rest to him.

During the contest, the bridges were subjected to increasing weight until they broke and dropped the weight.  He recalls that his bridge came in second, but in a way, was the best one because his design used the least amount of  balsa wood – it was light weight but very strong.

What is the catenary shape?  It is the shape of the St. Louis Arch and of many ancient and modern arches used in architecture;  the shape is most easily achieved by hanging a chain by its two ends. The natural shape it takes between the attachment points is the catenary shape.  It is also very close to the shape of the ends of an egg.

While teaching physics, my students showed how strong this shape is.  In a simple demonstration two students held a bed sheet between them to act as a catching net.  A raw egg (the free-roaming chicken, barnyard eggs are best for this) is thrown hard into the sheet by another student, and, unless the sheet is missed, the egg will not break.  At least I never saw it break from hitting the sheet, assuming the catchers did not let it roll off onto the ground.

The other impressive demonstration requires two straight-sided glass cylinders, such as drinking glasses, where one glass will fit closely inside the other.  The egg (raw)  is padded below and above with a sponge or folded paper towels, for example, and placed in the larger glass.

Important!  The egg is placed so the long axis of the egg is parallel to the sides of the glass; in other words, the egg is placed “on end” in the glass. The bottom of the inner glass is then slid into the outer glass until it is resting on top of the padded egg.

Using a chair to steady the person, and standing on a stool about the same height as the nested glasses, he or she gradually places all of his or her weight on the upper glass showing that the egg will support the weight without crushing.  Of course, there is a limit of how much it will support.  When I last did it, I probably weighed about 200 lbs, and did not break the egg.

Isn’t it amazing, that the law of gravity, as established by the creator, is what causes a chain to hang as it does, that this same shape is that of the eggs laid by various birds and reptiles, and that it forms the strongest type of free-standing arch?  Isaiah 34:15 says, “The owl will nest there and lay eggs, she will hatch them, and care for her young under the shadow of her wings.” God loves us and also invites us to abide in His strong shelter.

Posted by: T. Boyd | February 10, 2010

The Strange Catapult Force

“It is the glory of God to conceal a matter;  to search out a matter is the glory of kings” (Proverbs 25:2)

In the early days of science,  it was believed that there was no connection between electricity and magnetism.  The magnetic force was found in rocks with iron ore in them, and then magnets were made by rubbing these special rocks against iron or steel.  These were then used to make magnetic compasses, giving a wonderful advancement in navigation.

The early experiments with electricity included the investigation of lightning, made most famous with Benjamin Franklin’s dangerous flying of a kite during a thunderstorm (he and his assistant could have been easily killed by a direct hit).   It was also discovered that heat and light could be produced by passing the current from a battery through a thin wire.

However, to show there was no connection between electricity and magnetism, a magnetic compass was placed beneath a wire through which electric current was passed. The equipment was arranged so that the wire was at right angles to the compass needle, thinking that surely if there were a force between them, the needle would be deflected to become parallel to the wire.  But there was no deflection.

However, in 1820, Hans Oersted at the University of Copenhagen while preparing this demonstration, discovered that if the compass needle and the wire are parallel to start with, that the needle would swing to being perpendicular to the wire – just the opposite of that which had been predicted.  It was a serendipitous moment.  He had shown a connection between electricity and magnetism.

This led to the building of an electric catapult, hence the nickname given this force, which today is called the Lorentz Force, named after Hendrik Lorentz who formulated the mathematical equation in 1892 that describes it.

To picture the catapult, imagine a child’s swing scaled down to fit on top of a table.  You would use thin wires instead of chains to hold up the “seat” which is also made of wire. Everything would be connected to a battery so that electric current will flow down one “chain”, through the “seat”, and back up the other “chain.”

Directly below the “seat” you would hold a bar magnet with the north pole pointing upward. When the current was turned on through the “swing,”  the “seat” would be “catapulted” forward or backward, depending on the direction of the current.

You may have seen toys that swing back and forth tirelessly, run by a single AA battery that is based on this principle.  In fact the electrically powered baby swings operate by this catapult force. More importantly this Lorentz Force is what powers electric motors which have played such a large role in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.

Proverbs says, “It is the glory of God to conceal a matter;  to search out a matter is the glory of kings” (Proverbs 25:2)  It is such a blessing that He also puts in our hearts and minds the desire to discover these hidden laws of His creation.

Posted by: T. Boyd | January 26, 2010

Blue Skies and Red Sunsets

Like the appearance of a rainbow in the clouds on a rainy day, so was the radiance around him. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. (Ezekiel 1:28)


On our trip to the YMCA today, I asked my grandson why the sky is blue. He said, “Maybe it’s because of the water in the atmosphere.” I replied, “Well that could be part of the reason, but then why is the sky red around the sun at sunset?” He puzzled over that. After a little pause, I gave an explanation and his questions about it helped me clarify the description.

Light, as we described in some articles last year, is made up of small energy bundles called photons. There are red, green, blue photons, and all the other pure colors as well. And sunlight has a mixture of all these colored photons, giving an average to our eyes of white light, or at least it is white in outer space. But our atmosphere affects it in interesting ways.

As the collection of photons of white light passes through the air, the blue photons have about 10 times more chance of being scattered (bouncing off air molecules) than do the red photons. (Today in my research for writing this I found out that Einstein explained this scattering phenomena in 1911 – his contribution to science is amazing, isn’t it?)

Thus the red photons are more likely to pass through the air unimpeded while more of the blue ones bounce off in all directions. Thus when looking at the sky away from the sun, a person will see a mixture of light with more blue photons than red ones, and hence it looks blue – sometimes very blue depending on the sun’s position and the clearness of the air.

On the other hand, as people enjoy a sunrise or sunset, they are looking at the light passing through much more air than when the sun is overhead, so the effect of the blue photons being scattered out is greater, and hence, the direct light from the sun to their eyes or reflecting off the clouds looks red to them.

Why does the moon look larger on the horizon? In fact, it is not larger but is the so-called moon illusion. In fact the width of the moon is exactly the same as it is when it is overhead. On the other hand, the height of the moon on the horizon is actually a little reduced than when overhead, caused by the distortion of the light rays passing through the thicker atmosphere.

There are various theories for the cause of this illusion. The one I like best is that when the moon is near the horizon, our visual system is comparing it to the surrounding scenery, and knowing it is much further away, it seems larger. One article says to “trick your mind out of the moon illusion is to bend over at the waist and look at the moon upside down through your legs” (http://www.howstuffworks.com/question941.htm).

Posted by: T. Boyd | December 22, 2009

The Star of Bethlehem

When the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy (Job 38:7)

I have read lots of theories about what the star of Bethlehem might have been. The proposals range from a comet, an unusual conjunction of planets, or a new star, to an angel glorifying God with enough effulgence to lead the wise men to the house with the Christ child.  I admit I like that last possibility – the angel – the best.  But if it was not a supernatural event, I would propose another way it could have been.

There are old legends and ancient beliefs that have led to a scenario that seems to fit the story in Matthew 2:1-12.  It goes like this. First of all, astronomers certainly knew the difference between stars, planets, and comets, so I think the word here, “aster” in Greek, points to a star, not the other type objects.

The “star rising in the east” fits the belief at that time that when a person was born, a star would rise at that moment on the eastern horizon, and that star would pass directly over the place of birth when it reached the highest point in the sky (about 6 hours later), in other words, would have the same latitude as your birthplace. [ Please note the references for this: many astrology books and web sites - I don't like astrology at all, so I won't recommend a particular one, but a google search on "birth star same latitude as birthplace" will give you a list of them, if you are interested.]

In this miraculous birth of our Savior, I think maybe “His star” suddenly flared brightly – a nova or even a supernova.  There are about 10 novae discovered each year in the Milky Way galaxy, while a supernova in a galaxy our size only occurs once every 50 years or so. Either way, the flaring of this star caught the attention of these wise men.

I think it took more than a year from the “discovery” of this star for the wise men to arrive in Judea, based on Herod’s order to massacre all baby boys in Bethlehem who were under the age of two. By the time they got to Judea, the nova or supernova had gotten dimmer and was hard to see, especially around a city with its smoke-producing cooking and heating fires.  Once they left the city, they “rejoiced to see the star” in the clearer skies.

The star went ahead of them till it “stood over the place where the child was.”  This fits the motion of the star as it crept across the sky that night from east to west, and by “standing” over the house, I think that means when it reached its highest point it was directly over Bethlehem.

One legend has it that the wise men looked down an open well where they could see the star pass directly over their heads, with the star lined up exactly with their own reflections upon the water – proof of the exact latitude of the location of birth.

That is the story of how Bethlehem’s Star could have been “born” (nova = new star) at the time of the birth of Jesus, leading the wise men to Him.  We can join with the heavenly host in rejoicing over the good news that our Savior has come!

Posted by: T. Boyd | December 9, 2009

The Story of Quarks

I asked my bride (of 30 years) which science story of the 20th century would interest her the most, meaning, of course, which physics story, since that is what I am most comfortable talking about.  I gave her a choice of the discovery of electrons, protons, neutrons,  or quarks, and briefly described each story to her.

From wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

Her eyelids were very heavy toward the end of my recital.  She said what she enjoyed most was my animated face as I expressed my enthusiasm for those discoveries.  And then she asked me to explain more about quarks, so I thought I would write about them (I pronounce it, like all good Texans, as “quorks”,  on which she tried to correct me).

The quark story begins about 50 years ago, when protons, neutrons, and electrons were thought to be the fundamental particles of matter, although other types of particles were being found in cosmic rays and from the high energy accelerators.  By 1960 about 24 different “elementary” particles had been found with puzzling properties.

In 1956, Murray Gell-Mann proposed that there were even more fundamental particles named quarks which combined in various ways to make up many of the members of this “particle zoo”, as it was called.  In 1968,  high energy electrons were made to penetrate protons and showed that there were point-like objects inside the protons that interacted with these probing electrons.  The experimenters seemed to have found quarks.

It was decided that a proton is composed of two “up” quarks, each having a +2/3 charge, and one “down” quark with  -1/3 charge, where the unit of charge is +1 for a proton, and -1 for an electron. On the other hand, the neutron consists of one “up” quark and two “down” quarks, with a net charge of zero.

And, the theory, which has been supported by experiments, says that all of the various members of this class of particles known as hadrons (now numbering about 33) are made up of six different “flavors” of quarks and their anti-particle twins.  The six quarks are named: up, down, charm, strange, top, and bottom.

It seems that the force that binds the quarks together in these various particles is so strong that the quarks cannot be forced apart.  This is predicted by the theory, and thus far experiments to split the protons or neutrons into quark components have failed.

Isn’t it fascinating that even with such tiny things as protons and neutrons, scientists are able to find still smaller particles like quarks, demonstrating once again the wondrous complexity of God’s creation.

For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb.  I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Wonderful are your works; my soul knows it very well. (Psalm 139:13-14)

You can write Boyd at BrightMysteries@verizon.net

Posted by: T. Boyd | December 3, 2009

The Golden Ratio in Creation

The older I get,  the more I enjoy the beauty that exists all around us in the creation.  The second time I stood at the rim of the Grand Canyon,  after  a 10 year gap, I expected to be less impressed than the first time.  But again, amazed,  I stood there and gazed at it “with bated breath and whispering humbleness,” (thank you, Shakespeare).

I get the same thrill studying a spider web reflecting the early morning sunshine from the tiny droplets of water adhering to it and reading that the Creator gave that versatile creature from 2 to 8 spinnerets to spin several types of silk.  For example there is dragline silk, capture-spiral silk, and silk to wrap eggs in;  a different silk to wrap victims in, and a temporary silk to help build the web.

Wonderful too are the creations made by God’s children: inventions in technology, discoveries in science, and the beautiful language of mathematics.  For example, I get excited about the fractions 1/98, 1/49, and 1/7 (try them on a calculator and look for the patterns in the sequence of digits).   My wife is frequently amused by my enthusiasm for numbers.

But she did find the Fibonacci Sequence interesting.  It is made up of the numbers: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, … where each number is the sum of the previous two terms.  “O.K. , and where…,”  she responded.

“This set of numbers shows up in living organisms a lot,” I continued. “For example, flowers with 3, 5, 8, 13, and 21 petals in blossoms are very common, while other numbers of petals are not so common.

“Look at your hands: 2 hands, each containing 5 fingers, each of which has 3 parts, separated by 2 knuckles. ” And I measured the joints of her index finger, and showed her that the lengths were very close to 2, 3, 5 and 8 centimeters (the 4th bone is hidden in the hand).  “Now that,” she said, “really is neat.”

“If you use a calculator to divide: 3/2, 5/3, 8/5, 13/8, etc.  you will see that they tend to the decimal fraction:  1.6180339.. .  (Note that this number has a unique property shown by 1/1.6180339 = 0.6180339)

“This special number, 1.618.. , is called the golden ratio.  It has been used for centuries in architecture for the ratio of the sides of buildings, in art work as the ratio of the sides of a picture; it is the ratio of the height to width of Mona Lisa’s face by Leonardo, and on and on.

“It is an aesthetically pleasing ratio. “  I measured her pretty face, and said it fitted the pattern.  She rewarded me with a smile.

As I ponder these designs, I conclude that our Maker is not only Himself astonishing, but He loves for His creatures to enjoy the beauty of the creation.  “Let them praise the name of the Lord!   For He commanded and they were created.” (Ps. 148:5)

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35 other followers