Posted by: T. Boyd | December 22, 2009

The Star of Bethlehem

When the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy (Job 38:7)

I have read lots of theories about what the star of Bethlehem might have been. The proposals range from a comet, an unusual conjunction of planets, or a new star, to an angel glorifying God with enough effulgence to lead the wise men to the house with the Christ child.  I admit I like that last possibility – the angel – the best.  But if it was not a supernatural event, I would propose another way it could have been.

There are old legends and ancient beliefs that have led to a scenario that seems to fit the story in Matthew 2:1-12.  It goes like this. First of all, astronomers certainly knew the difference between stars, planets, and comets, so I think the word here, “aster” in Greek, points to a star, not the other type objects.

The “star rising in the east” fits the belief at that time that when a person was born, a star would rise at that moment on the eastern horizon, and that star would pass directly over the place of birth when it reached the highest point in the sky (about 6 hours later), in other words, it would have the same latitude as your birthplace. [ Please note the references for this: many astrology books and web sites – I don’t like astrology at all, so I won’t recommend a particular one, but a google search on “birth star same latitude as birthplace” will give you a list of them, if you are interested.]

In this miraculous birth of our Savior, I think maybe “His star” suddenly flared brightly – a nova or even a supernova.  There are about 10 novae discovered each year in the Milky Way galaxy, while a supernova in a galaxy our size only occurs once every 50 years or so. Either way, the flaring of this star caught the attention of these wise men.

I think it took more than a year from the “discovery” of this star for the wise men to arrive in Judea, based on Herod’s order to massacre all baby boys in Bethlehem who were under the age of two. By the time they got to Judea, the nova or supernova had gotten dimmer and was hard to see, especially around a city with its smoke-producing cooking and heating fires.  Once they left the city, they “rejoiced to see the star” in the clearer skies.

The star went ahead of them till it “stood over the place where the child was.”  This fits the motion of the star as it crept across the sky that night from east to west, and by “standing” over the house, I think that means when it reached its highest point it was directly over Bethlehem.

One legend has it that the wise men looked down an open well where they could see the star pass directly over their heads, with the star lined up exactly with their own reflections upon the water – proof of the exact latitude of the location of birth.

That is the story of how Bethlehem’s Star could have been “born” (nova = new star) at the time of the birth of Jesus, leading the wise men to Him.  We can join with the heavenly host in rejoicing over the good news that our Savior has come!

Posted by: T. Boyd | December 9, 2009

The Story of Quarks

I asked my bride (of 30 years) which science story of the 20th century would interest her the most, meaning, of course, which physics story, since that is what I am most comfortable talking about.  I gave her a choice of the discovery of electrons, protons, neutrons,  or quarks, and briefly described each story to her.

Her eyelids were very heavy toward the end of my recital.  She said what she enjoyed most was my animated face as I expressed my enthusiasm for those discoveries.  And then she asked me to explain more about quarks, so I thought I would write about them (I pronounce it, like all good Texans, as “quorks”,  on which she tried to correct me).

The quark story begins about 50 years ago, when protons, neutrons, and electrons were thought to be the fundamental particles of matter, although other types of particles were being found in cosmic rays and from the high energy accelerators.  By 1960 about 24 different “elementary” particles had been found with puzzling properties.

quarks

From WikiPedia: Quarks

In 1956, Murray Gell-Mann proposed that there were even more fundamental particles named quarks which combined in various ways to make up many of the members of this “particle zoo”, as it was called.  In 1968,  high energy electrons were made to penetrate protons and showed that there were point-like objects inside the protons that interacted with these probing electrons.  The experimenters seemed to have found quarks.

It was decided that a proton is composed of two “up” quarks, each having a +2/3 charge, and one “down” quark with  -1/3 charge, where the unit of charge is +1 for a proton, and -1 for an electron. On the other hand, the neutron consists of one “up” quark and two “down” quarks, with a net charge of zero.

And, the theory, which has been supported by experiments, says that all of the various members of this class of particles known as hadrons (now numbering about 33) are made up of six different “flavors” of quarks and their anti-particle twins.  The six quarks are named: up, down, charm, strange, top, and bottom.

It seems that the force that binds the quarks together in these various particles is so strong that the quarks cannot be forced apart.  This is predicted by the theory, and thus far experiments to split the protons or neutrons into quark components have failed.

Isn’t it fascinating that even with such tiny things as protons and neutrons, scientists are able to find still smaller particles like quarks, demonstrating once again the wondrous complexity of God’s creation.

For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb.  I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Wonderful are your works; my soul knows it very well. (Psalm 139:13-14)

You can write Boyd at BrightMysteries@gmail.com

Posted by: T. Boyd | December 3, 2009

The Golden Ratio in Creation

The older I get,  the more I enjoy the beauty that exists all around us in the creation.  The second time I stood at the rim of the Grand Canyon,  after  a 10 year gap, I expected to be less impressed than the first time.  But again, amazed,  I stood there and gazed at it “with bated breath and whispering humbleness,” (thank you, Shakespeare).

I get the same thrill studying a spider web reflecting the early morning sunshine from the tiny droplets of water adhering to it and reading that the Creator gave that versatile creature from 2 to 8 spinnerets to spin several types of silk.  For example there is dragline silk, capture-spiral silk, and silk to wrap eggs in;  a different silk to wrap victims in, and a temporary silk to help build the web.

Wonderful too are the creations made by God’s children: inventions in technology, discoveries in science, and the beautiful language of mathematics.  For example, I get excited about the fractions 1/98, 1/49, and 1/7 (try them on a calculator and look for the patterns in the sequence of digits).   My wife is frequently amused by my enthusiasm for numbers.

But she did find the Fibonacci Sequence interesting.  It is made up of the numbers: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, … where each number is the sum of the previous two terms.  “O.K. , and where…,”  she responded.

“This set of numbers shows up in living organisms a lot,” I continued. “For example, flowers with 3, 5, 8, 13, and 21 petals in blossoms are very common, while other numbers of petals are not so common.

“Look at your hands: 2 hands, each containing 5 fingers, each of which has 3 parts, separated by 2 knuckles. ” And I measured the joints of her index finger, and showed her that the lengths were very close to 2, 3, 5 and 8 centimeters (the 4th bone is hidden in the hand).  “Now that,” she said, “really is neat.”

“If you use a calculator to divide: 3/2, 5/3, 8/5, 13/8, etc.  you will see that they tend to the decimal fraction:  1.6180339.. .  (Note that this number has a unique property shown by 1/1.6180339 = 0.6180339)

“This special number, 1.618.. , is called the golden ratio.  It has been used for centuries in architecture for the ratio of the sides of buildings, in art work as the ratio of the sides of a picture; it is the ratio of the height to width of Mona Lisa’s face by Leonardo, and on and on.

“It is an aesthetically pleasing ratio. ”  I measured her pretty face, and said it fitted the pattern.  She rewarded me with a smile.

As I ponder these designs, I conclude that our Maker is not only Himself astonishing, but He loves for His creatures to enjoy the beauty of the creation.  “Let them praise the name of the Lord!   For He commanded and they were created.” (Ps. 148:5)

Posted by: T. Boyd | November 3, 2009

Papa Talks with Grandson about Black Holes

For His eternal power and divine nature have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. (From Romans 1:20)

My 3rd grade grandson is very alert and a deep thinker for his age.  We have some good talks and I enjoy swapping ideas with him.  We have been talking on our trips to the YMCA and back.

I asked him, “What should I write about this week?   How about vacuum chambers?”

He thought for a while.  “You were supposed to write about astronomy.  How about Black Holes?”

“O.K.  Do you know what a black hole is?”  I thought we had talked about it a long time ago.

His memory for details amazes me.   He said, “It’s a place where the gravity is so strong that not even light can escape.” (I’m not sure of his exact words, and he will correct me, I’m sure.)

I asked him, “Why can’t we see a black hole?” He wasn’t sure, so I told him, “If no light can get out, then there is no light to see it by.  Of course, if the whole sky is lit up by galaxies of stars, then we should be able to see a spot where there is an absence of light, and that might be a black hole.”

I continued, “But black holes are so small and so far away, that we have never been able to really see one, as far as I know.  But we have seen points in space that are radiating energy from what seems to be from material being sucked into a black hole, never to escape again – at least that is the theory.”

Why can light not escape?  It’s because light loses energy as it travels away from a star – it doesn’t lose speed – the speed of light is always the same; however we can see its loss of energy by its wavelength getting greater – its color shifts toward the red end of the spectrum.  If the gravity is strong enough, the light loses all of its energy and cannot get out.  In fact, it is thought the photons of light actually fall back toward the star.

If no light or any other radiation can escape from the massive star, then it has become a black hole. When stars have burned up all their fuel, the gravitational pull of the star upon itself causes it to collapse into a very dense object which is predicted to become a white dwarf (a star that is white hot, but cooling down to be a brown dwarf).  Or it could become a neutron star where protons change into neutrons because the gravity is so strong.  Or if the mass is great enough, it could become a black hole.

It is estimated that when a star about 10 times the mass of our sun collapses, it will become a black hole, smaller in diameter than the earth, but with a mass that is about 3 million times that of the earth.

And that concludes our brief description of black holes.

“For His eternal power and divine nature have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made.” (From Romans 1:20)

Posted by: T. Boyd | October 27, 2009

Relativity for Relatives, Part II

Let all the earth fear the LORD: let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him (Psalm 33:8)

I discussed last time that the speed of light is constant as measured by the observer no matter how fast he himself is moving.  For example, if a space ship were moving at a speed of 90,000 miles/sec, toward a star, a beam of light from that star would still measure as having a speed of 186,000 miles/sec, the same as it would measure when the space ship is at rest compared to the star.  Classical physics, and common sense, would say that it should measure 186,000 + 90,000 miles/sec, but common sense fails here.

This result, when predicted in 1900 or so by Einstein and Lorentz, did not seem credible, but it has been shown many times to be true with experiments.  Even more incredible are the consequences of this:   moving clocks slow down (as measured by an observer “at rest”), and moving objects get shorter along the axis of the motion, again as measured by a person at rest.  These are called “time dilation” and “space contraction“, respectively.

Why is it called relativity?  Let’s imagine 2 identical rocket ships coasting by each other in empty space at a high velocity.  Each could say that the other ship was moving and he himself was at rest.  There is no detectable way for them to say who is moving.  It is all relative.

And the time dilation, etc. is reciprocal.  Each space traveler would observe that the other ship’s clock was losing time compared to his own clock and that the other ship was shorter than his own.  How can this be?

Welcome to the weird world of relativity, the effects that normally can only be detected by very precise instruments,  like atomic clocks, or in the case of objects moving near the speed of light.  For example, one early observation was that certain cosmic ray particles (called mesons) created in the earth’s upper atmosphere, with well known, very short life spans, would not be seen as plentifully as they are at the  earth’s surface unless their life-spans were extended about 10 times by moving at about 99.5% of light speed.

There is an easy-to-read and entertaining fantasy book written by George Gamow in 1946, called Mr. Tompkins in Wonderland.  (An updated version, called Mr. Tompkins in Paperback, is available at bookstores – I just found some used ones on-line for $3).  Mr. Tompkins attends a lecture on relativity and then dreams he is in a wonder land where the speed of light is 10 miles/hour.  So these effects upon time and length are obvious just by watching ordinary motion.  For an example, a bicycle goes by and looks much shorter in length than it should.  And as the cyclist speeds up, the length of the bike shrinks even more.

Mr. Tompkins, then gets on a bicycle to catch the other rider.  When he gets to moving, he notices that the buildings on the street start getting skinnier and skinnier the faster he moves.  And then he realizes why it is called “relativity” – each observer sees things from his relative frame of reference,  He notices that the distance to the other biker shrinks, and that the other biker himself looks normal when they are traveling at the same speed.  The story is wonderful fiction, yet reflects a reality that we don’t ordinarily see because the speed of light is so great in our universe.

The discovery of the law of relativity has uncovered another mysterious wonder of creation that continues to amaze God’s sons and daughters and causes them to honor and glorify Him.

Posted by: T. Boyd | October 10, 2009

Relativity for Relatives

I asked my wife, “Do you want to hear more about Einstein’s theory of relativity?” 

She answered, “Not at the moment.  Why don’t you tell Mei Mei about it.” 

Said I, “Well, she doesn’t really fit the clever title of this article.”

“Sure she does. She’s a member of the family, you know.”

“But Shih Tzus are not known for their complex thoughts,” I protested.   My wife replied, “However, she will give you her full attention.”

“All right; listen up, Mei Mei,”  I announced to my loyal dog as she chewed on one of her dozen chews currently in circulation.  She lifted her head and looked at me, expecting a kibble for her effort.

I began the story:  Once upon a time, actually in the late 1800’s, several scientists decided to settle a debate that had been going on for years. Is there or is there not an invisible substance that fills the universe, a medium in which light waves travel? Since waves are always associated with vibrations, then some substance must be vibrating to transmit the waves. And that substance for light waves had been labeled as “aether” (or we would spell it “ether”), a substance that supposedly filled the universe by means of which the waves of light traveled. 

Since this must be true, the scientists speculated, then as the earth whizzes through the aether on its trip around the sun, they should be able to see an effect on the speed of light caused by that motion.

Two scientists, Michelson and Morley, set up a very sensitive apparatus in 1887 that would detect even the slightest change in this speed by using the interaction of two beams of light, one beam parallel to the direction of the earth’s motion in space, and the other beam at right angles to the first beam.

Mei Mei’s eyes were beginning to wander, so I added some zooming motions with my arms and made swishing noises of the earth’s path in the aether around the sun, body language that would have made my grandson proud.

Michelson and his partner saw absolutely no change in speed. Maybe the aether was moving at the same speed as the earth. They waited 6 months later to repeat the experiment, when the earth’s direction would be reversed in its solar orbit.  Again, no change.  This was very puzzling,  for it seemed to indicate that the speed of light was a constant which did not vary with Earth’s movement.

In stepped the theoretical physicists, including Einstein.  They hypothesized that experimenters in a laboratory which was traveling at constant speed in a straight line would always measure the speed of light to be 186,000 miles/second no matter how fast the lab was moving, and that aether did not exist at all!

Mei Mei kindly licked my face and went over to take a nap.  I exclaimed, “Mei Mei, don’t you want to know what the consequences of such a radical theory would be?”  No response.

Next week I will tell why this discovery requires rulers to get shorter and clocks to slow down if they are traveling in a fast moving laboratory.

The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world (John 1:10)

Read more at BrightMysteries.net, or Tiny.cc/BrtMys, and you can write Boyd at BrightMysteries@verizon.net.

Posted by: T. Boyd | October 10, 2009

The Search for Ceres, Juno and Uranus

He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what is in the darkness, and the light dwells with him (Daniel 2:22)

Some astronomers, including yours truly, plan to see Juno, one of the brighter asteroids, and the planet Uranus this fall as both are presently in good position for observing.

In the 1980’s while teaching at Randolph-Macon College (RMC), some of my students used the college’s observatory to search for the largest asteroid, Ceres, also classified as a dwarf planet. We knew from the Naval Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac where it was supposed to be located among the stars.

We took careful photographs of that part of the sky using a Schmidt Camera, 8 inches in diameter and about 2 feet long, which was mounted on the side of the main 12 inch diameter telescope.  This allowed us to use the telescope to aim and guide the camera.

In total darkness, we cut the 35mm. film into individual frames.  Then we inserted one piece of film at a time into a magnetic film holder, and placed it into the camera through a small door in the camera’s side.  After the camera was closed, we could turn on our flashlights to help us position the telescope and to take notes on our procedures.

After we aimed the main telescope, we extinguished the lights and, being careful to cause no movement or vibration of the apparatus, we uncovered the lens of the camera for a few seconds to capture the star and asteroid light onto the film.

We then repeated these steps several times, using varying amounts of time to give us a range of exposures.  The first part of the search was finished.

Back in the science building we developed the pieces of film and mounted them in slide holders.  We projected the film negatives with a slide projector upon a screen, and compared the image with sky charts of the same part of the sky.

We searched for what seemed like hours, knowing that once we found the matching pattern in the charts, we could then look for an extra dot on the negatives that would indicate the asteroid.  RMC had a wonderful set of photographic charts of the sky done by the Palomar giant telescope in California which we used for comparison.

After almost giving up in frustration, someone in the group noticed the pattern looked familiar, but was reversed left and right.  We flipped the slide and quickly found the matching area on the charts, and then…Eureka!  We found an extra point of light on the screen right where the almanac predicted.  We had found the asteroid, Ceres!

It was a very exciting moment for the students and teacher alike.  We felt we had joined the ranks of those long ago scientists who found things hidden in the skies.

Also found at TinyURL.com/BrtMys,  To join Boyd in trying to see Juno and Uranus through a telescope, write him at BrightMysteries@verizon.net.


Posted by: T. Boyd | September 21, 2009

Relativity and Einstein’s Clocks

He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, he has put eternity into man’s heart. (Ecclesiastes 3:11)

It is time for another lively discussion with my bride about physics and astronomy.

She declares, “I read today that the atomic clock in Denver gains time over its sister clock in Europe.  And that gravity is responsible.   See, I told you no one really knows what time it really is!”

“Oh, that’s right,” I reply.  “Before we got married every clock in your house was set to different times, all fast, so you could get somewhere early or at least not too late, right?”

“Yes, it worked very well, and then I married you, and I have been late ever since,”  she answered.  “You went around the house and set every clock and watch so that they read the exact time to the nearest second.  It was crazy!”

I patiently added, “But I left your wrist watch alone, so you could have your own standard time. Anyway,  do you know why gravity affects a clock?”

“No,”  she replied cautiously, not sure she wanted to endure one of my long-winded expositions.  “But, go ahead.”

“Well,  Einstein said to think of a rocket ship that is accelerating in gravity-free space with the same acceleration that earth’s gravity would cause a body to fall.  All experiments would give the same result on the moving rocket or on a rocket at rest on the earth.”

I took a sip of my tea and continued, “Now, suppose that you are on the rocket ship that is accelerating, lying on the floor looking ‘upward’ toward the ceiling.  If there were a clock on the ceiling, sending a flash of light every second toward the floor, the flashes of light would be seen by you as arriving at a faster rate than one each second.  This is because you are accelerating upward.  To you, the ceiling clock would be running faster than one on the floor.”

“Wait a minute (no pun intended),” she interrupted.  “The clock would also be accelerating, would it not?  And so the effect should cancel.”

“No, ” I argued, “the propagation of light is independent of the motion of the source (the clock).  So the blips of light would arrive somewhat bunched together in time.”

“Now, because of the equivalence between an accelerating rocket ship, and one resting with the equivalent gravity on the earth, a clock on the ceiling of the rocket ship, would be running faster than one on the floor by the same amount in both situations,” I continued.

I concluded, triumphantly, “Therefore, because Denver, the mile-high city, is further away from the center of the earth than the city in Europe where the other clock is, the signals from the higher altitude clock will be received at a rate slightly faster than the one at the lower altitude!”

Unruffled by my logic, she smiles, “Precisely.  So, in other words, no one really knows what time it is.”

Posted by: T. Boyd | August 24, 2009

Number of Galaxies and Stars

Here is an expanded version of the first part of the last blog entitled:  Galaxy Zoo … This one was just submitted to the Caroline Progress.

I finally jumped in. I found out about the GalaxyZoo.org web site some time ago, but had never participated till last Saturday. I did the 20 minute tutorial with hands-on practice, and then enjoyed classifying about 10 galaxies in my first session.  It is easy and requires no prior knowledge.

The Galaxy Zoo site has a huge deposit of deep sky photographs taken by the 8 foot diameter telescope at Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico. The photographs are posted on the site.  Volunteers examine pictures one by one and answer a series of questions about the appearance of each galaxy.  Then the project scientists analyze the answers statistically to classify each galaxy.

The creators of the site expected a few thousand volunteers, but they had a huge response, with some 70,000 galaxies being classified every hour  on the first day of the announcement.  The number of volunteers is now more than 150,000.  One of them, a Dutch teacher, Ms. Hanny Van Arkel, 25, discovered a one-of-a-kind sight now appropriately called Hanny’s Voorwerp’ (Dutch for object).  It is a large bright greenish-blue “blob”, still awaiting classification, located near a huge galaxy.  Vast opportunities await us!

On Sunday I gave a short talk during the worship time about the amazing number of galaxies, each containing a huge of number of stars, all created for God’s glory and for our enjoyment.  Yesterday, I read on the NASA web that there are about 350 billion galaxies in our universe.

Since the Milky Way Galaxy, where we live, is an average size galaxy with an estimated 200 billion stars, then the number of stars in the universe is about 70 billion-trillion stars!

I have no feel for such large numbers.  I have a hard time trying to get a feel for the size of a trillion dollars, a term frequently used to describe the U.S. budget.  So lets try to think how big just one trillion is.

Last week on the radio, I heard a man tell a tale about a trillion dollars ($1,000,000,000,000) that gave me a better grasp on the magnitude of that number.  Here is a paraphrase of what he said.

“Suppose you are very, very wealthy and older than Methuselah, and you are making payments on your mansion on a non-interest loan of one trillion dollars.  Your house payment is 1 million dollars a day ($1,000,000/day)!”

The story continues.  “You bought the house on the day that Christ was born 2000 years ago [like I said, you are very old], and started paying back the loan at that time – a million bucks a day.  Then, how much of the loan have you paid off?  Answer: about 70%.  ‘When’. you ask, ‘will my last payment be?’  Answer: in the year 2750.  Only 741 years to go.”

So that’s one trillion.  The number of stars in the universe, by comparison,  is about 70 billion times that.    It is an understatement to say that the universe that God made and maintains “by the word of His power [Heb 1:3]” is mind-boggling.  He is awesome.

Posted by: T. Boyd | August 21, 2009

Galaxy Zoo and Watching Moons of Jupiter

Hanny's Voorwerp

Blue-green object found by Hanny Van Arkel

He delivers and rescues;
He works signs and wonders
in heaven and on earth, (Daniel 6:27 ESV)

I finally jumped in. I found out about the Galaxy Zoo web site some time ago, but never participated till today. I did the 20 minute tutorial with hands-on practice, and then enjoyed classifying about 10 galaxies in my first session.

This site has a huge deposit of deep sky photographs taken by the 2.5-meter telescope at Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico. The photographs were posted on the site and they asked for volunteers to go through the pictures one by one and answer a series of questions about how the galaxy appears to them. Then the project scientists analyze the answers statistically to classify each galaxy.

The creators of the site expected a few thousand volunteers, but they had a huge response, with some 70000 galaxies being classified every hour within one day of the announcement. Last summer one of the volunteers, a Dutch teacher, Ms. Hanny Van Arkel, 25, discovered a one-of-a-kind sight now appropriately called Hanny’s Voorwerp’ (object). It is still awaiting identification. It is a large bright greenish-blue “blob” near a huge galaxy.

You can join in on the fun for free at GalaxyZoo.org and contribute to a worthwhile project.

The other heavenly sight which I hope to be able to see (the August skies in Caroline County, VA, permitting) is to watch the activity of Jupiter’s moons. Every 6 years, we have a period of time when the plane of the orbits of the moons going around Jupiter is edge-on with Earth bound observers. And we are in that period now and for the next three or four months.

During that time, the moons will periodically eclipse one another, blocking the sunlight illuminating a moon. These are called eclipses just as when our Earth blocks the sunlight reaching our moon. Also the other periodic class of events is occultations when one moon blocks our view of one of the other moons. A table of times that these can be seen in North America is given by SkyAndTelescope.Com.

I will watch the weather prediction to try to see as many of these that I can. If I could rig up a light meter (photometer) to my telescope, I could contribute to the compilation of data that helps the team of astronomers to learn more about each moon. But even if I can’t do that, it will be a fun effort. I enjoy just seeing the moons anyway, and to see these eclipses and occultations will be very exciting to me.

Some of the upcoming better events of these Jupiter events are (times in EDT):

Aug. 31, 10:04 p.m. – an 81% occultation

Sep. 15, 10:12 p.m. – an 86% eclipse

Sep. 23, 12:41 a.m. – a 96% eclipse

If you would like to join me in these viewings, you can write me at BrightMysteries@verizon.net

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories